Singapore is one of the most active hubs for blockchain work in Asia. Clear rules, strong tech talent, and access to global markets make the city a good place to build. Many teams here ship real products used by banks, fintechs, and Web3 projects.
This article lists the Top 10 Blockchain Developers in Singapore to know in 2025 and gives practical guidance for choosing a partner. Each pick adds value in a different way: some build core networks, some deliver enterprise tools, and others handle data, wallets, or payments. The goal is to help readers match needs with the right builder.
To keep things useful, this article also explains budgets, key skills, and compliance basics in Singapore. If a project needs a network, a DeFi tool, or a payment flow, the sections below show what to check before signing a deal.
How to Choose a Blockchain Developer in Singapore
Start by writing a short scope: one page with the “must have” features, a two-month roadmap, and a clear success metric. Then map the scope to a builder type:
- Core protocol/infra (e.g., node providers, L1/L2 teams) for scale and uptime.
- Enterprise platform teams for finance use cases, workflows, and audits.
- DeFi / Web3 app teams for smart contracts, AMMs, or liquidity design.
- Data/analytics teams for dashboards, risk, and reporting.
- Payment teams for checkout, payouts, and compliance.
Check delivery signals: Look for public repos, audits, uptime status pages, sandbox demos, and docs. Ask for 2–3 case studies with outcomes (users, TVL, TPS, settlement speeds, and error rates). For smart contracts, review audit links and bug bounty programs. For payments, verify licensing, settlement time, and chargeback policy.
Run a small paid pilot: Scope a 2–4 week pilot with one clear deliverable: a smart contract with tests, a working node setup, or a live payment flow in a test environment. Pay a fixed fee, agree on success metrics, and decide go/no-go based on real output.
Skills to Look for in a Blockchain Developer in Singapore
- Smart-contract expertise: Assess experience with Solidity, Vyper, Move, Rust, or chain-specific languages. Review unit tests, property-based tests, and gas optimizations. Ask about upgrade patterns, proxy safety, and incident response.
- Security mindset: Good teams think “secure by default.” They use formal reviews, static analysis, fuzzing, and third-party audits. They plan key management, permissions, rate limits, and safe rollbacks. For finance or enterprise work, they align with standards like ISO/IEC 27001 and have runbooks for incidents.
- Infra and data depth: Check track records with node ops, RPC scaling, indexing, and monitoring. For analytics, look at ETL pipelines, data freshness, chain coverage, and labeling quality. Uptime SLAs and post-mortems show maturity.
- Product and compliance literacy: Strong builders write clear docs, ship dashboards for non-engineers, and understand MAS rules for payments or tokens. They explain risks in plain words and propose simple defaults.
Also Read: Regulatory Challenges and Compliance in the Blockchain Industry
Top 10 Blockchain Developers in Singapore to Know in 2025
Here are some of the leading blockchain builders making waves in Singapore for 2025:
- Snap Innovation – Full-stack Web3 product engineering from smart contracts to UX
- Chainstack – Managed multi-chain nodes and APIs with strong SLAs
- Zilliqa – Singapore-founded L1 with performance focus and EVM paths
- STACS (Hashstacs Pte. Ltd.) – Enterprise tokenisation and capital-markets solutions
- Kyber Network – DeFi liquidity, routing logic, and smart-contract systems
- Algorand Foundation (Singapore HQ) – Ecosystem R&D, grants, and developer programs
- Nansen – On-chain analytics with labeled wallets and robust data pipelines
- TripleA – MAS-licensed crypto payment rails for merchants and fintechs
- Request Finance – Stablecoin invoicing, payroll, and B2B finance ops
- Treehouse Finance – Yield/risk analytics and on-chain rate tooling for institutions
Looking to build, scale, or integrate Web3 in 2025 from Singapore? Here’s a detailed look at the Top 10 Blockchain Developers in Singapore, reshaping the ecosystem this year. Whether you need enterprise-grade tokenization, compliant payment rails, liquidity infrastructure, or analytics at scale, these teams offer the engineering depth, documentation, and delivery discipline to help you ship with confidence.
1. Snap Innovation
Snap Innovation builds end-to-end blockchain products, from smart contracts to front-end apps and integrations. The team supports multiple chains and focuses on clean, reliable releases with good documentation. They are known for rapid delivery cycles and readable code that new devs can maintain. For companies that want a one-shop partner, they can cover discovery, build, and post-launch support. Their mix of product thinking and engineering makes them a practical first call for MVPs and production upgrades.
| Pros | Cons |
| Full-stack delivery from research to launch | Breadth means you must scope clearly to avoid spread |
| Experience across chains and toolkits | May prioritize higher-impact engagements |
| Good documentation and handover habits | Advanced cryptography needs may still require specialists |
| Fast iteration with clear milestones | Availability can vary by project queue |
| Comfortable with compliance-aware builds | Pricing reflects end-to-end coverage |
2. Chainstack
Chainstack lets teams deploy nodes and APIs fast without running infra themselves. The platform supports multiple ecosystems and offers clear SLAs and monitoring. This lowers time-to-market and reduces DevOps overhead for small and large teams. Their Singapore presence makes account support and procurement easier for local companies. If you need stable RPC and data access across chains, this is a strong default.
| Pros | Cons |
| Quick, reliable node/API access | Less control than self-managed infra |
| Multi-chain coverage with SLAs | Heavy custom setups may need workarounds |
| Good docs and dashboards | Usage costs can grow with scale |
| Fast onboarding for new projects | Vendor lock-in risk if not planned |
| Local presence for support | On-prem requirements may need custom deals |
3. Zilliqa
Zilliqa is a Singapore-founded L1 focused on performance and developer tools. The team ships core protocol work and supports EVM paths for app builders. Their research culture helps projects that need direct L1 guidance or ecosystem intros. If your roadmap includes performance tests, grants, or protocol-level features, this team matters. Builders can tap both the core engineering group and community resources for support.
| Pros | Cons |
| Deep protocol and research strength | Ecosystem focus may differ from other L1s |
| EVM support paths for devs | L1 upgrades may require adaptation |
| Access to grants and community | Migration from other L1s takes planning |
| Strong presence in Singapore | Niche tooling may lag larger chains |
| Clear technical communication | Limited if you need non-ZIL primitives |
4. STACS (Hashstacs Pte. Ltd.)
STACS delivers production solutions for banks, asset managers, and green finance. They focus on digital assets, tokenization, and workflow systems that meet enterprise needs. This includes audits, reporting, and controls that fit finance. If your product targets regulated users, their playbooks reduce risk. Expect pragmatic engineering and delivery aligned to real operations.
| Pros | Cons |
| Enterprise-ready workflows and controls | Enterprise timelines can be longer |
| Track record with financial institutions | Custom features may require SOWs |
| Strong compliance posture | May be heavier than startup needs |
| Clear delivery and documentation | Pricing reflects enterprise-grade |
| Singapore HQ for stakeholder access | Narrower scope outside finance |
5. Kyber Network
Kyber builds liquidity protocols used across many chains and apps. The team ships smart contracts, routing logic, and integrations for trading flows. They understand MEV, slippage, and on-chain risk at a deep level. Builders in trading, aggregation, or market making can learn from their patterns. Their research and incident response culture help maintain trust.
| Pros | Cons |
| Proven AMM/aggregation expertise | DeFi risks require active monitoring |
| Multi-chain experience | Market cycles can affect roadmap priorities |
| Strong security posture and audits | Complex liquidity design isn’t trivial |
| Good partner integrations | Regulatory shifts may impact features |
| Clear dev tooling and docs | Requires robust testing in prod-like envs |
6. Algorand Foundation (Singapore HQ)
Algorand Foundation supports research, grants, and dev adoption for the Algorand ecosystem. Teams can access guidance, events, and funding paths for builds. Their Singapore base makes collaboration easier for local founders. If you plan to target Algorand rails, they help with intros and resources. The combination of technical and ecosystem support is useful for early-stage teams.
| Pros | Cons |
| Grants, programs, and community | Chain choice narrows future options |
| Research and standards support | Smaller ecosystem vs. top-3 L1s |
| Local HQ for fast coordination | Tooling depth varies by use case |
| Intros to partners and service providers | Migration costs if you switch chains |
| Education and events for devs | Grant cycles have lead times |
7. Nansen
Nansen labels wallets and builds dashboards that many users trust. The team runs strong data pipelines and a front end that surfaces insights clearly. Protocols, funds, and growth teams use it for research and monitoring. If your product needs analytics or wallet-based segmentation, study their design. Their mix of data engineering and UX is a helpful model.
| Pros | Cons |
| High-quality labeled datasets | Coverage varies by chain/segment |
| Robust pipelines and uptime | Subscription cost for full features |
| Clear dashboards and APIs | Data freshness limits still exist |
| Useful for growth and risk teams | Custom metrics may need extra work |
| Good documentation and support | Privacy-sensitive cases need care |
8. TripleA
TripleA enables businesses to accept and send crypto while staying compliant in Singapore. Their stack covers checkouts, payouts, and risk controls. The license from MAS helps reduce merchant and partner concerns. Integration paths are straightforward for common carts and platforms. For fintechs and merchants, this is a practical way to add stablecoin rails.
| Pros | Cons |
| Regulated footing (license) builds trust | Supported geos and assets can be limited |
| Simple merchant integrations | Fees and spreads must be modeled |
| Risk/AML controls included | Less flexible than building in-house |
| Stablecoin support for B2B | Vendor reliance for compliance updates |
| Local support and documentation | Feature rollout follows regulatory pace |
9. Request Finance
Request Finance helps companies manage invoices, payroll, and expenses in stablecoins and fiat. The product centralizes approvals, payments, and records. Many Web3 teams use it to stay organized and audit-ready. The API and exports make accounting simpler during tax season. If you pay contributors worldwide, this removes a lot of manual work.
| Pros | Cons |
| Purpose-built for crypto-native ops | Feature set is focused (not a full ERP) |
| Smooth invoicing and payroll flows | Complex HR/payroll rules may need add-ons |
| Good exports for accounting | Requires policy setup and training |
| Stablecoin + fiat support | Multi-entity structures need careful config |
| Clean UI and permissions | Depends on counterparties’ wallet hygiene |
10. Treehouse Finance
Treehouse builds data and analytics around yields, risk, and on-chain rates. The team contributes to standards and offers tools for institutions and power users. If you model risk or manage structured products, their work helps. They combine protocol knowledge with careful data engineering. The result is clearer decisions for treasuries and DeFi teams.
| Pros | Cons |
| Strong focus on yield/risk analytics | Niche if your app is not finance-heavy |
| Institutional-grade dashboards | Learning curve for non-quants |
| Standardization efforts in rates | Coverage differs by protocol |
| Helpful for treasury decisions | Paid tiers for deeper features |
| Singapore presence for collabs | Market cycles can affect data demand |
Singapore’s scene blends research, infra, finance, and strong product delivery, which is why global teams keep building here. If you are choosing partners, start with your core need: infra, protocol depth, payments, analytics, or enterprise delivery. Then match it to 2–3 teams on this list and book short technical scoping calls. Ask for recent case studies, audit history, and handover plans before you commit. With clear scopes and timelines, these builders can help you ship faster and safer in 2025.
Compliance and Risk Basics in Singapore
Singapore supports digital assets while keeping guardrails, which is why many teams locate here. For builds that touch payments, licenses, and controls are part of the plan. Work with partners who understand when a license is needed, how client funds are handled, and what records to keep.
As a simple rule: if a product handles consumer funds or merchant settlements, pick partners with the right authorization and a record of audits and security controls. For institutional pilots, align with risk teams early. Stablecoin payment trials and tokenised assets programs in the city show how real use ties to clear controls and bank-grade processes.
Finally, document choices: chain selection, custody model, rate sources, and incident steps. Good builders write this down and keep it updated as the product evolves.
Also Read: 10+ Top Blockchain Wallet Companies to Consider in 2025
Common Mistakes When Hiring a Blockchain Developer in Singapore
- Choosing by brand alone: A well-known name does not always fit the scope. A nimble specialist may deliver faster and cheaper. A match needs skills.
- Skipping audits and tests: Bugs in smart contracts or payment flows are costly. Plan audits and set a testing threshold (coverage, fuzzing hours) into the contract.
- Ignoring operations: Who runs nodes, who rotates keys, and who monitors logs at 3 a.m.? Write this into the agreement. Ask for the pager and the runbook.
- Forgetting user experience: Complex seed flows, weak error messages, and unclear fees push users away. Demand a simple UX and strong help text.
Conclusion
This article mapped out the Top 10 Blockchain Developers in Singapore to watch in 2025 and explained how to choose the right builder for a project. Each team on the list brings a specific strength: infra, protocols, enterprise tools, DeFi, analytics, or payments. The best choice depends on scope, risk, and timelines.
To move forward, define one success metric, pick two or three candidates, and run a short pilot. Ask for code samples, audits, uptime proof, and a clear plan for handover. A small, focused test is the fastest way to see real value.
Disclaimer: The information provided by HeLa Labs in this article is intended for general informational purposes and does not reflect the company’s opinion. It is not intended as investment advice or recommendations. Readers are strongly advised to conduct their own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any financial decisions.
Joshua Soriano
I am a writer specializing in decentralized systems, digital assets, and Web3 innovation. I develop research-driven explainers, case studies, and thought leadership that connect blockchain infrastructure, smart contract design, and tokenization models to real-world outcomes.
My work focuses on translating complex technical concepts into clear, actionable narratives for builders, businesses, and investors, highlighting transparency, security, and operational efficiency. Each piece blends primary-source research, protocol documentation, and practitioner insights to surface what matters for adoption and risk reduction, helping teams make informed decisions with precise, accessible content.
