Institutional desks now treat digital assets as a normal part of multi-asset portfolios. What changed is the quality of prime brokerage options. In 2025, the leading providers offer deeper liquidity, better risk controls, and faster settlement. This article explains the market, then compares 10 active names in one simple section.
This article uses clear language so a wide range of readers can follow. It focuses on the core needs of funds, treasurers, and trading teams: execution quality, custody strength, and smart risk control. It also covers due diligence steps and a simple rollout plan for new mandates.
Before choosing a provider, teams should map their goals: reduce slippage, unlock financing, improve reporting, or strengthen operational resilience. The providers below differ in scope, regions, and strengths. The checklists and notes in the later sections can help a team make a confident choice.
What Crypto Prime Brokerage Does in 2025
A crypto prime brokerage gives institutions a single point of access to trading venues, OTC liquidity, financing, and custody tools. The goal is to lower friction across many tasks: price discovery, order routing, settlement, and reporting. The provider stands between the client and multiple counterparties. It helps reduce the number of direct relationships a fund must manage.
In practice, this means one onboarding, one legal stack, and one risk framework. The desk then gains access to exchanges, OTC market makers, and derivatives venues supported by the prime broker. For some desks, this is the only way to reach deep liquidity without spreading operations across many platforms.
In 2025, providers will also extend into off-exchange settlement and cross-margining. Tools such as ClearLoop (where supported) allow a fund to keep assets in custody while trading on connected venues. This reduces direct exposure to exchange failures and can improve capital efficiency. Several providers integrate such models or partner with custody specialists to deliver them.
Institutional Tools: Execution, Liquidity, Financing, and Custody

This section explains the core tools that institutions expect from a crypto prime broker in 2025. It covers execution quality, access to liquidity, financing options, and safe custody. It also includes reporting and governance, which help with audits and internal controls.
Execution & Liquidity
The prime broker should aggregate liquidity across OTC and exchanges, handle large tickets, and limit slippage. Some providers publish scale signals (for example, large options block flow or multi-trillion lifetime volumes). The exact figures change, but the direction is clear: more venues, more products, and better routing. This helps funds that need block trades, TWAP/VWAP, or algorithmic execution across many tokens and time zones.
Financing
Good prime brokers offer credit lines, repo-like financing, and structured borrow/lend against BTC, ETH, and select large-cap tokens. Financing helps delta-neutral funds, basis trades, and market-making strategies. It also supports hedging for treasuries that hold digital assets on balance sheets. In 2025, more providers moved to support swaps and OTC options under a single risk umbrella, so teams can net exposures and improve capital use.
Custody
Custody is now central to the prime value proposition. Some brokers are vertically integrated (custody + trading + financing). Others partner with custodians and settlement networks to keep client assets segregated and bankruptcy-remote. The ability to move funds quickly between cold storage and trading balances can be a key advantage, especially during fast markets.
Reporting and Governance
Institutions need full audit trails, real-time P&L, position monitoring, and exportable data for fund admins. Staking and governance, where allowed by mandate, often come with integrated reporting. This keeps compliance teams, risk committees, and external auditors aligned.
Also Read: Top 10 Crypto Exchange Liquidity Providers in 2025
10 Cryptocurrency Prime Brokerages in 2025
Here are some of the leading crypto prime brokerages making waves in 2025:
- FalconX – Full-stack institutional prime with execution, financing, custody, and banked fiat rails
- Coinbase Prime – Integrated U.S.-regulated custody, trading, and financing for funds and asset managers
- Hidden Road – Non-bank global prime expanding digital-asset swaps and OTC options, pending Ripple acquisition
- Matrixport – Institutional prime with risk/portfolio tooling and off-exchange settlement integrations
- Nexo Prime – Unified trade, borrow/lend, and custody with institutional credit lines
- Bitcoin Suisse – Swiss institutional services (trading, custody, staking) under CH frameworks
- OSL – Hong Kong–licensed institutional brokerage with enterprise integrations
- B2C2 – Deep institutional liquidity with prime-style credit and 24/7 execution
- BCB Group – Regulated payments + prime solution linking fiat rails with crypto workflows
- GCEX – Digital prime broker with white-label “broker-in-a-box” and institutional platforms
Looking to consolidate liquidity, streamline settlement, and improve capital efficiency in digital assets this year? Here’s a detailed look at the Top 10 Cryptocurrency Prime Brokerage options reshaping institutional access in 2025. Whether you need block/OTC execution, derivatives and financing, off-exchange settlement, or bank-grade fiat connectivity, these providers offer the coverage, tooling, and operational safeguards to run professional crypto mandates with confidence.
1. FalconX
FalconX provides multi-asset institutional access across execution, financing, and custody, positioning itself as a full-stack prime for crypto-native and TradFi allocators. The firm emphasizes deep liquidity, options analytics/flow tools, and global market connectivity for block, algo, and OTC workflows. In 2025, FalconX announced a strategic partnership with Standard Chartered aimed at strengthening fiat FX rails and settlements across Asia, the Middle East, and the U.S., reinforcing its banking connectivity. The first phase includes a suite of bank services with an intention to broaden offerings as the relationship scales. This combination targets faster onboarding, improved capital efficiency, and more reliable cross-border fiat support for institutions.
| Pros | Cons |
| Strong bank connectivity via Standard Chartered enhances fiat rails. | Bank integrations can vary by region and KYC/AML thresholds. |
| Broad toolset: execution, financing, and custody in one stack. | Complex feature set may require bespoke integration work. |
| Institutional liquidity and options tools for larger tickets. | Access and terms often tailored to institutions (not SMBs). |
| Global coverage suitable for multi-venue routing. | Counterparty/banking landscape can evolve with regulation. |
2. Coinbase Prime
Coinbase Prime offers an integrated institutional stack that unifies custody, trading, and financing in a single interface, complemented by risk tooling and capital-efficiency features. Prime’s NYDFS-qualified custody and governance/staking (where policy allows) have made it a fit for hedge funds and asset managers seeking regulated infrastructure. In 2025, Coinbase reiterated that Prime consolidates trading, financing, and custody for sophisticated strategies, while press coverage highlighted hedge-fund adoption. Coinbase is also pursuing additional regulatory structuring in the U.S., underscoring its focus on compliance and scale. Altogether, the platform aims to provide a familiar prime-brokerage model for institutions entering or expanding in digital assets.
| Pros | Cons |
| Single pane of glass for trading, financing, and custody. | U.S. focus and controls may limit feature parity across regions. |
| Regulated, large-scale infrastructure trusted by funds. | Pricing and financing terms can be less flexible for smaller tickets. |
| Agency execution and broad liquidity access. | Onboarding and approvals can be rigorous (by design). |
| Governance/staking options where permitted. | Product availability is subject to jurisdictional policy shifts. |
3. Hidden Road
Hidden Road operates as a global, non-bank prime broker and expanded its U.S. digital-asset swaps prime in May 2025, adding OTC options prime support in July 2025. In April 2025, Ripple agreed to acquire Hidden Road for approximately $1.25B, with expectations to scale multi-asset prime services; closing remains subject to regulatory approvals. The roadmap suggests deeper balance-sheet support and potential cross-margining use cases alongside Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin. Hidden Road’s model targets credit intermediation, access to derivatives, and cross-venue liquidity for institutions. For funds seeking swaps/options prime across digital assets with global coverage, it’s a key 2025 mover.
| Pros | Cons |
| New U.S. swaps and OTC options primes launched in 2025. | Acquisition closing/approvals still pending. |
| Non-bank, multi-asset prime approach with derivatives focus. | Integration timelines post-acquisition may affect roadmaps. |
| Potential cross-margining synergies via Ripple/RLUSD. | U.S. derivatives access is subject to evolving regulation. |
| Global coverage with institutional credit intermediation. | Rapid product expansion can require new ops/processes. |
4. Matrixport
Matrixport offers institutional prime services spanning execution access, risk/liquidity support, and portfolio management tools. The firm integrates with Copper’s ClearLoop for off-exchange settlement, aiming to reduce exchange counterparty risk while maintaining trading flexibility. Matrixport publicly posted a PB system fee notice effective January 1, 2025, clarifying cost structures for strategy accounts. It also highlights case studies around structured solutions for corporates, indicating breadth beyond standard buy/sell flows. This mix appeals to allocators prioritizing capital efficiency and operational safeguards around exchange exposure.
| Pros | Cons |
| ClearLoop integration helps mitigate exchange risk. | PB system fees, effective 2025, add explicit costs. |
| Institutional coverage with risk/portfolio tooling. | Some features depend on third-party integrations. |
| Experience with structured transactions for corporates. | Jurisdictional availability varies. |
| Global client base and coverage. | Off-exchange models require specific ops workflows. |
5. Nexo Prime
Nexo Prime positions itself as a digital-asset prime brokerage providing tools for trading, borrowing, lending, and custody from one platform. Public pages and earlier launch materials emphasize 24/7 access, diversified liquidity, and institutional client support. The broader Nexo ecosystem adds white-glove and private-client options, plus secured credit lines against crypto collateral. Institutions looking for yield, financing, and execution in one stack may find the bundled approach attractive. 2025 listings continue to reference Nexo Prime as an institutional option for integrated services.
| Pros | Cons |
| Unified trade/borrow/lend/custody experience. | Risk tolerance depends on your policies for lender-operator models. |
| Round-the-clock institutional support. | Some features limited by regional regulations and KYC tiers. |
| Credit lines against collateral for capital efficiency. | White-label/private features may require scale commitments. |
| Diversified liquidity + OTC access. | Counterparty risk concentration if using many Nexo services. |
6. Bitcoin Suisse
Bitcoin Suisse is a Swiss crypto finance firm providing institutional-grade trading, custody, and staking with a regulatory posture aligned to Swiss frameworks. Materials describe turnkey staking and custody for corporates, funds, and foundations, which can complement a prime-style workflow under Swiss governance. The firm’s jurisdiction and infrastructure appeal to teams seeking a European/Suisse setup and exposure to tokenization/staking within local rules. Custody and staking services aim to minimize operational overhead (no client hardware required). While not all pages label it “prime brokerage,” the institutional service mix is frequently used in prime-adjacent mandates.
| Pros | Cons |
| Swiss regulatory environment and brand recognition. | Not branded purely as “prime,” scope depends on needs. |
| Institutional custody and staking for multiple client types. | Broader prime features (credit/derivs) may require partners. |
| Turnkey operational model reduces staking overhead. | Cross-border onboarding may lengthen timelines. |
| European base useful for EU/CH strategies. | Pricing and service tiers tailored to institutions. |
7. OSL
OSL is a publicly listed digital-asset group serving institutions from Hong Kong, with a focus on compliant, licensed infrastructure. In 2025, OSL reported strong growth in its payments arm and continued to scale services for global clients. The firm integrated with Talos to expand institutional trading infrastructure and connectivity across jurisdictions, adding execution tooling and routing. For teams needing Asia coverage with regulated venues and enterprise integrations, OSL remains a core option. The combination of exchange/brokerage, infrastructure partnerships, and payment rails is designed to support cross-border flows.
| Pros | Cons |
| Hong Kong licensing and compliance focus. | Some services are tied to the HK/Asia regulatory scope. |
| Talos integration enhances the institutional execution stack. | Product availability can differ by client domicile. |
| Payments + brokerage capabilities under one roof. | Market access depends on counterparties/custodians. |
| Public company transparency. | Listing/quarterly cadence ≠ full view of all business lines. |
8. B2C2
B2C2 is a major institutional liquidity provider, majority-owned by Japan’s SBI Group, delivering 24/7/365 OTC and electronic execution. The firm has long signaled electronic prime brokerage ambitions layered atop its single-dealer platform, leveraging SBI’s balance sheet and distribution. In 2025, B2C2 highlighted continued APAC expansion and roles across SBI entities, underscoring scale and reliability. Many funds effectively treat B2C2 as a prime-like access point for OTC flow and credit lines, even when they use multiple venues. For managers prioritizing deep, consistent liquidity with credit intermediation, B2C2 remains a cornerstone counterparty.
| Pros | Cons |
| Deep, reliable OTC/electronic liquidity globally. | Not a full-suite prime for every workflow. |
| Backed by SBI; strong APAC distribution signals. | Some services may be bespoke and not “self-serve.” |
| 24/7/365 execution with credit intermediation. | Reliance on a single-dealer model for certain features. |
| Acts as de facto prime access for many funds. | May need complementary custody/financing partners. |
9. BCB Group
BCB Group serves the digital-asset economy with regulated payments, wallets, and trading, and previously launched an institutional prime brokerage solution for investment managers. In October 2025, BCB partnered with Copper to streamline fiat and digital-asset flows, pointing to stronger settlement/collateral linkages for institutions. This complements its banking and payment rails, aiming to reduce operational friction for treasury and trading teams. The model is attractive for managers who want unified fiat on/off ramps with institutional crypto workflows. The ecosystem approach can cut reconciliation times and improve funding flexibility.
| Pros | Cons |
| Strong payments + banking rails with crypto access. | Historic “prime solution” scope varies by client setup. |
| New Copper partnership to optimize flows and custody. | Availability subject to regional banking relationships. |
| Institutional focus for managers and funds. | May require multiple BCB + partner integrations. |
| Useful for treasury and multi-venue operations. | Pricing depends on volumes and service mix. |
10. GCEX
GCEX is a regulated digital prime broker focused on institutional clients, offering execution, settlement, and risk solutions. The firm provides “broker-in-a-box” and white-label tooling, plus an institutional trading platform (XplorSpot). In 2025, GCEX also expanded via acquisition activity to broaden its wealth-manager footprint. For brokers and institutions seeking a turnkey, white-label path into digital assets, GCEX is a frequent example provider. Its emphasis on secure access and credit intermediation supports firms building their own branded offerings.
| Pros | Cons |
| White-label and “broker-in-a-box” solutions. | Feature depth depends on the chosen modules/partners. |
| Institutional execution/settlement with risk tooling. | Not all jurisdictions are supported equally. |
| Acquisition-led expansion into wealth/WM channels. | May require additional custody/banking arrangements. |
| Platform (XplorSpot) for rapid deployment. | Prime credit terms vary by client profile. |
The 2025 prime-brokerage landscape continues to converge with TradFi norms, more regulated bank rails (e.g., Standard Chartered), bigger balance sheets (e.g., Ripple/Hidden Road), and integrated stacks (e.g., Coinbase Prime). Your best fit depends on jurisdiction, credit, derivatives access, settlement model (on-exchange vs. off-exchange), and operational integrations (OMS/EMS, custodians, and bank partners). Pilot with a narrow scope, compare effective all-in costs (credit + borrow + settlement + slippage), and test real-world funding/withdrawal times. As always, verify claims with primary docs and ensure alignment with your risk, compliance, and client-asset obligations.
Risk Controls to Ask for Custody, Segregation, and Operational Resilience

This section outlines the key protections an institution should expect from a crypto prime broker in 2025. Strong controls reduce loss risk, improve audit readiness, and support smooth operations during stress. Use the points below as a checklist during due diligence.
Asset Segregation and Control
Request clear proof of segregated accounts, not omnibus pools. Ask how assets are titled in custody, and how collateral is handled during off-exchange settlement. A strong setup lets a client trade without moving assets onto venues that hold customer funds, reducing exposure to exchange-level failures.
Counterparty Risk
Review credit intermediation policies. Does the broker stand between the client and venues, or pass exposure through? When the model includes OTC options or swaps, confirm how margin calls, variation margin, and cross-margin rules work across instruments. Some providers added OTC options prime in 2025 to improve margin efficiency; understand how those exposures net with spot and futures.
Banking Rails and Fiat Settlement
Efficient fiat rails lower post-trade risk and operational cost. Partnerships with major banks can improve FX conversion and reduce settlement friction. In 2025, some prime brokers formed direct bank partnerships to strengthen fiat operations. Ask for settlement cutoffs, supported currencies, and on-shore account details for your regions.
Governance and Transparency
Look for clear disclosures, SOC reports where available, and transparent incident reporting. A clean escalation path and a named service team matter when deadlines are tight. Also, request a summary of major outages, lessons learned, and how the provider monitors wallet health, reconciliations, and exchange-side credit limits.
Regulatory Posture
Match the provider’s regulatory setup to your mandate. For U.S. clients, review how prime services map to local rules. For Europe and the U.K., check MiCA-related practices and permissions. For Hong Kong and Singapore, review the local licensing scope and permitted products. Large providers with public press activity often outline these details in announcements and institutional pages; combine those with your legal review.
How to Choose: A Simple Checklist and Red Flags

Checklist (yes/no):
- Does the provider aggregate multiple exchanges and OTC desks with smart order routing?
- Can it prove deep liquidity in the pairs you trade most?
- Are custody and trading integrated, or linked through a well-known settlement network?
- Are client assets bankruptcy-remote and clearly segregated?
- Are there credit lines or margin frameworks that fit your strategy?
- Does it support the derivatives you need (futures, options, swaps) with cross-margin?
- Are there bank partners and fiat rails in your base currencies?
- Is reporting good enough for admins and audits (exports, APIs, time-stamped fills)?
- Is there a named account team with 24/7 cover across regions?
- Are fee schedules and financing terms clear and in writing?
Red flags:
- Vague custody structure or unclear asset title.
- “Trust us” answers to segregation or rehypothecation questions.
- Opaque margin rules and manual processes for calls.
- “Coming soon” for basic reports or trade confirmations.
- One venue dependency for most liquidity.
- No public track record, no bank partners, or inconsistent disclosures.
Pricing clarity. Ask for a full schedule: trading fees, borrow rates, financing haircuts, custody fees, off-exchange settlement fees, and any network or withdrawal fees. As an example of transparency practices, Matrixport posted a PB system fee notice effective January 1, 2025 — teams should expect this level of clarity from any provider.
Also Read: 10 Top Binance Competitors & Alternatives in 2025
Implementation Playbook: 30-60-90 Days
Days 0–30: Design and Approvals
- Define the core use cases: basis trades, spot accumulation, hedging, or market making.
- Choose jurisdictions and book entities for onboarding.
- Start KYC/KYB and legal review with two finalists to keep options open.
- Validate custody paths (integrated vs. third-party), wallet policies, and signer rules.
- Map data needs for the fund admin: trade files, positions, and end-of-day marks.
- Ask for a full list of supported venues, products, and tokens, and remove any you cannot hold or trade.
Days 31–60: Connect and test
- Open test balances and perform a “dry run” of deposits, trades, withdrawals, and off-exchange settlement if used.
- Run execution tests on your top pairs at a realistic size; capture slippage against benchmarks.
- Test margin calls and variation margin processes with a safe sandbox position.
- Integrate APIs for orders, positions, and reports into your OMS/EMS and admin flows.
- Confirm fiat rails: test same-day wires in and out in your base currencies.
- Review incident response and escalation by simulating a minor reconciliation break.
Days 61–90: Scale and monitor
- Move a share of flow (for example, 20–30%) to the prime broker and compare outcomes.
- Enable cross-margin or financing after the first two monthly closes, not before.
- Create weekly health checks: liquidity scorecards, error logs, and settlement timeliness.
- Schedule a quarterly risk review with the provider and your admin to align on changes.
- Keep one backup route for critical trades (secondary broker or direct OTC) to reduce single-point risk.
Conclusion
This article showed how a crypto prime brokerage works, what tools matter, and how to compare providers. The single-section list offered 10 active names in 2025 with different strengths: some lead in liquidity and options flow, others in custody, regional access, or fiat rails. Use the checklist and playbook to match a provider to your goals and controls.
There is no universal “best.” A U.S. multi-strategy fund may favor deep derivatives and tight U.S. custody controls. A Hong Kong family office may care more about local licensing and regional access. A market maker may place the most weight on credit lines and real-time settlement. Focus on fit: mandates, regions, and risk appetite should drive the choice.
Finally, keep a living due diligence file. Update it after each quarter as products, partners, and rules change. Re-test execution and settlement at least twice a year. The prime broker is a key partner in digital asset operations. A careful, simple process will protect capital, improve returns, and keep teams ready for the next market phase.
Disclaimer: The information provided by HeLa Labs in this article is intended for general informational purposes and does not reflect the company’s opinion. It is not intended as investment advice or recommendations. Readers are strongly advised to conduct their own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any financial decisions.
Joshua Soriano
I am Joshua Soriano, a passionate writer and devoted layer 1 and crypto enthusiast. Armed with a profound grasp of cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology, and layer 1 solutions, I've carved a niche for myself in the crypto community.
- Joshua Soriano#molongui-disabled-link
- Joshua Soriano#molongui-disabled-link
- Joshua Soriano#molongui-disabled-link
- Joshua Soriano#molongui-disabled-link

